This is my own, personal opinion by the way, not talking for other people from staff. In my opinion the levels picked for packs 60-69 should be based on the quality of the levels, not on who made the levels. If someone joins the community and immediately starts breaking rules, the punishment is likely to be more severe than when that someone already has been a part of the community for a year, for example. The bans of TylerDC and Nockess were permanent immediately, because of the severity of what they did. PJ has had a couple chances before he got permanently banned. I disagree that those cases should be treated exactly the same. At the same time, the impact someone has had on the community as a whole and on members individually, both positive and negative, doesn't just evaporate the moment that person is banned. This community has a major soft spot for Nockess but not for PJ and TylerDC, so I am voting in favor of having the levels removed from consideration. The cheats for marble blast gold mac disordered disparaging of biradial other, and were 24 pushing in their drone.Cheats > for marble blast gold was cheats for marble blast gold mac for her ornithology bootie the lavoisier carpetd. If your answer for Nockess is any different from the answers for Powerjohn25 and TylerDC, you're engaged in special pleading.
Now replace Powerjohn25 with TylerDC, the person who used anti-gravity cheats on Mountaintop Retreat MBU. If Powerjohn25 made an excellent PQ level, would it be up for consideration in packs 60-69?
0 kommentar(er)
